you guys suck ass
- Monday, May 23, 2005 at 11:32:47 (PDT)
Donatello was an artist who was a fine sculptor therefore it is very wrong to quote him as "gay" just because he sulpted human bodies. Havent you ever seen a human bodie? If so the person who quoted that must have been gay because he or she definatly would have seen a human bodie. We all own a human bodie do we not? It is also unknown if he was gay because of the long time period between now and then. But it is most unlikely.
Anominouse <
winnydapoo@hotmail.com>
- Wednesday, May 05, 2004 at 03:21:23 (PDT)
no he was not
brian <
bobn37@hotmail.com>
- Monday, April 19, 2004 at 12:45:50 (PDT)
Maybe the pictures look gay because Donatello was gay, genius. They are all exquisite!
J T <
jturne04@umail.com>
- Friday, June 13, 2003 at 03:24:29 (PDT)
you need to put some of the no-famous ones up. the other ones are gay.
- Monday, May 19, 2003 at 18:42:09 (PDT)
My rather brash comment was aimed for the one at the bottom of the comment page, the one made in January...
Anonymous <
wmilo@aol.com>
- Wednesday, April 09, 2003 at 19:46:57 (PDT)
Oh hush! What do yuo know about the body anyway you narrow-minded twit?
Anonymous <
wmilo@aol.com>
- Wednesday, April 09, 2003 at 19:44:59 (PDT)
It's obvious, the comments before, were made by teenagers.
Learn to appreciate fine art kids!
Meg
- Tuesday, April 01, 2003 at 12:52:30 (PST)
put the nude ones up
John Denver <
N/A>
- Thursday, March 20, 2003 at 07:01:34 (PST)
ya maybe with bottom message
- Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 19:00:50 (PST)
I agree!
- Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 18:59:20 (PST)
someone please put Eros and Psyche up there
- Tuesday, January 28, 2003 at 16:19:19 (PST)
i think these pictures are gay
- Thursday, January 23, 2003 at 07:25:32 (PST)
